View Single Post
  #9   Report Post  
Old 03-11-2006, 04:17 PM posted to rec.gardens.orchids
K Barrett K Barrett is offline
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by GardenBanter: Jul 2006
Posts: 1,344
Default DNA sequence question

Was that on the Sorceror II? J Craig Ventner's effort? He was the fellow
that beat the government's Human Genome Project to sequence the human
genome. He also was one of the folks I was thinking about when I asked my
question. A few years ago he was on 'Science Friday' (NPR) talking about
how he scoops up plankton, sequences the DNA, and has found over 800 genes
that deal with handling light. Again, I wondered 'how does he know?' Plus,
he's got one hell of a web page:
http://www.sorcerer2expedition.org/v.../HTML/main.htm

Jealousy overwhelms me.

K Barrett

"al" wrote in message news:i_x2h.5189$Z66.2452@trnddc07...
I saw a TV show on my new 60" HD TV about a census of marine micro
organisms that is currently underway.

They are using cutting edge genetic sequencing tools to count new micro
organisms in sea water. They collect the water, strain it through ever
finer filters to collect a gooey glob of micro organisms and then they
extract their DNA by slicing it into tiny nucleotide bits, then they
replicate these bits, then they REASSEMBLE them back into complete
genomes....and out of this gene puree and reassembly process comes
something a computer program can use to count the number of unique
organisms that were in the sea water sample BEFORE they were chopped to
bits.

One of the remarkable things they have discovered, other than the Amazing
and unpredictably large number of new species at the microscopic level
are lots of gene groups with interesting mutations on gene groups which
they already know are used by these organisms to do things like turn light
into energy, break down oily carbon compounds, enhance immunity to cold,
etc.

It is just scary what bags of genes called 'humans' can infer about
themselves based on what is literally a sampling of their gene pool.



wrote in message
oups.com...
K Barrett wrote:
Nothing makes you feel older than finding out everyting you were taught
isn't true anymore.


It's even worse when it's your job. Research that required three years
of late nights in the lab when I was a grad student now takes about 15
minutes on the computer. Many of the techniques that I learned are
completely obsolete, and it has been less than ten years since I
defended my dissertation.

Nick