View Single Post
  #9   Report Post  
Old 24-11-2006, 12:30 AM posted to rec.gardens.edible
Olin Olin is offline
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by GardenBanter: Sep 2006
Posts: 8
Default "King Fruit" - why do we remove it?


"Steve" wrote in message
...
Olin wrote:
----- Original Message ----- From: "Rachel Aitch"

Sent: Friday, November 17, 2006 11:03 AM, Subject: "King Fruit" - why do
we
remove it?

I was always taught to thin out fruit during the late spring/early
summer, in order to get fewer but better fruits.
But why do we have to take out the King fruit, the central one? I'm
talking particularly about apples here.
Logically (yes, I'm old enough now to rebel against what I've been
taught!) shouldn't that be the one that stays?
Any theories, anyone?
Rachel Aitch



Apple blossoms occur in groups of five. The first and largest is the
king
blossom. We do not remove the king but remove all of the others instead.
The reason is to concentrate the sugars in a single and the largest
blossom
so it will produce the largest fruit. If the king is removed and the
others
allowed to fruit there will be more, but smaller, apples and it will also
be
necesssary to do more thinning.

Olin



That's right. I don't usually remove flowers but when I thin apples, I
leave the king fruit. That's how it's done, as far as I know. The king
fruit is at the center of the cluster and the smaller ones form a circle
around it.

Steve


Back to the original question about why would you take out the king fruit
and leave the others? The only reason I can think of is it might increase
total yield if the fruit is to be used for processing (apple sauce, apple
butter, cider, vinegar, etc.) instead of eating it raw,

Olin