"Gill Passman" wrote in message
...
At what point has anyone - me, Jan or Roy - actually stated that this is
not a valid discussion....methinks the woman protests too much
==================
Ok, so am I to assume that BOTH sides would be and could be presented?
:-) Even if the moderator/s don't agree that research has been proven to be
flawed and fudged in so many cases in the past?

One of the main reasons I stopped exposing Quack medicine was when I learned
just what the truth was were research is concerned.
--
ZB....
Frugal ponding since 1995.
rec.ponder since late 1996.
My Pond & Aquarium Pages:
http://tinyurl.com/9do58
~~~~ }((((* ~~~ }{{{{(ö ~~~~ }((((({*





--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com