GardenBanter.co.uk - View Single Post

(o)(o)[_1_]

On 10 Jan 2007 21:03:32 -0800, wrote:

Jim Webster wrote:

snip

I confess I don't really care. I correct them when they tell lies about my
industry, but as far as I am concerned if they don't want to eat meat, fine,
there are an increasing number of people out there who do
Terrorism is merely terrorism, and we have jails for people who commit that
sort of offence

It must have been a careless admission that you are with the meat
industry. I long wondered why some people attack animal rights
advocates and those who speak out against cruelty to animals on
alt.animals.ethics.vegetarian. I also suspected that the intensity of
those attacks are driven not by any conviction but by pure self
interest of those who profit from the horrible suffering of animals
produced by factory farming. Animals as living, feeling, suffering
creatures mean nothing to the likes of you who try to justify your
cruelty on helpless animals for your profit margin.

Animal rights advocates are not terrorists but the meat industry people
who tourture animals are terrorists. I really do not know the
percentage of people who do not eat meat but I am sure that the numbers
are on the rise. Each video that shows the brutality of meat industry
on helpless animals brings more people closer to saying no to food
produced by cruelty.

How can anyone believe a single word you post when you are motivated by
making money off the cruel treatment of animals? What we need is better
and more effective laws to keep the meat industry from selling unsafe
meat produced by cruel methods to an unsuspecting public.

I wholeheartedly agree. The world is not going to go veggie overnight,
but until it does, there should be the strictest measures in place to
protect animals, and treat them in a genuine, humane manner.

It's not difficult to see where people like Webster come from, happy
to sell their souls for a pittance. He is a puppet of the CLA, and
probably enforcing their bidding.