View Single Post
  #22   Report Post  
Old 24-01-2007, 08:29 PM posted to rec.gardens.orchids
Gene Schurg Gene Schurg is offline
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by GardenBanter: Aug 2006
Posts: 149
Default The battle of the scale (not the diet kind)

It's a hot humid day in the greenhouse.

The hot stud scale slides over next to the hot blob of a babe, "Hey slimy,
how about you and me make some wild passionate scale love?" "I so love the
shape of your probiscus." "Is there room under that shell for both of us?"

Awwww....young scale love.



"Diana Kulaga" wrote in message
...
Gene, stop!

Diana G

"Gene Schurg" wrote in message
news:uLOth.1148$FN1.200@trnddc08...
Dianna,

After all this is "G" rated newsgroup. We can't be too graphic.

How's this "When the hot young masculine scale comes upon a sweet curvy
babe
of a scale....."

Gene



"Diana Kulaga" wrote in message
news:aHOth.780$ch1.474@bigfe9...
"When the momma scale mates with the daddy scale"........ You owe me a
keyboard, Gene!

Diana

"Gene Schurg" wrote in message
news:dtyth.6934$U81.4308@trnddc06...
Diana,

When the momma scale mates with the daddy scale the momma lays eggs

under
her shell. At some point the momma scale dies and protects the eggs

with
her shell which gets leathery and dry. After some time the eggs

hatch
and
a
bunch of small whitish dusty looking babies crawl out from under the

shell
and look for a nice leaf to attach to. These are the crawlers. In

large
quantities they could be mistaken for mealie bugs.

Gene




"Diana Kulaga" wrote in message
...
Gene & Rob,

I have a question for both of you. Thankfully, scale is generally

not
a
huge
problem for me. I see it now and then, but seldom, really. And I

have
never
seen anything that I could identify as crawling scale. When I *have*

had
scale, it appears attached to the plant, having sunk its wicked

fangs
in
already. Thorough searches have not produced anything further.

Am I missing something?

Diana

"Rob" wrote in message
...
Gene Schurg wrote:
Rob,

It is interesting that you could be observing the same thing as

I.
Did
you
spray or drench with the Bayer product? Did you water between
applications
where the plants could suck up water without the chemicals?


I tried a drench (trash can and pump with hose) with just the

bayer
for
three consecutive weeks in early summer. That didn't work, or at

least
not completely. When I added the IGR into the mix, it was applied
as

a
spray to the point of complete saturation of as much leaf surface

as
possible (top and bottom), again for three consecutive weeks,

within
a
couple hours after watering the greenhouse in my normal way. I'm
not
sure
of the rationale of that, but I did have one. It made sense to
water
before so that I wouldn't wash out chemical before it had a chance
to
be
absorbed, and I thought that perhaps the leaves would be more

actively
transpiring right after a nice watering and more susceptible to
absorbing
chemical.

Distance is supposed to have translaminar systemic activity
(absorbed
through the leaves), which is one of the reasons I picked it. I

don't
think EnstarII is systemic (I could be wrong). It is about the

same
cost,
but you have to buy a whole quart... They target the same

pathway.

And actually, come to think of it, I used orthene instead of
imidocloprid
for the first two weeks. Both have systemic activity. I was
worried
that
the bugs were becoming resistant to repeated imidocloprid

treatment,
and
I
hadn't used orthene in a while. This way I was hoping to get the
resistant ones in the first two passes, and get the longer

residual
of
the
imidocloprid on the last one. And orthene is cheap... Probably a
stupid
idea.

--
Rob's Rules: http://littlefrogfarm.com
1) There is always room for one more orchid
2) There is always room for two more orchids
2a) See rule 1
3) When one has insufficient credit to obtain more
orchids, obtain more credit