In message , Janet Tweedy
writes
In article , Mike Lyle
writes

To all. (You probably don't want me clogging up the thread with
individual replies.) That's very strange: I'd have expected the scores
to be available immediately, since they must surely be machine-graded.
I'll look into it. Of course his interpretation of the data won't be
done by the computer, and that will take time. I've already let him know
that a lot of those who kindly gave their time would be interested in
some sort of debriefing document; but as that would be based on the
dissertation as a whole it can only be done at the end. But I'll keep
hounding him gently.

--
Mike.



Good job someone else commented on the scores, I was really miffed that
in my old age I could only get 144 out of poss. 200? But then I am a
sad competitive individual anyway
Well, Janet, I got 143, so you beat me by 1. From looking at a link on
someone else's posting in this thread, I don't think it works the way
you have posted, although I thought it did before I read the web page.
144 is apparently very high.
snip
Though on one question I ticked the box only to realise as it faded
away that I had ticked the wrong one! Which probably goes to show I am
also less dextrous than I used to be as well as getting dimmer.

IIRC, one of the shapes looked to me as though it had a little curve at
the corner of one of the triangle but that was probably an optical
illusion.
--
June Hughes