View Single Post
  #12   Report Post  
Old 25-02-2007, 10:59 AM posted to uk.environment.conservation,uk.rec.gardening,uk.rec.birdwatching
[email protected] malcolm@jgj-jewellers.demon.co.uk is offline
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by GardenBanter: Feb 2007
Posts: 9
Default SHAMEFUL ADMISSION BY SCOTLAND'S SHOOTING INDUSTRY

In message ,
writes
On Sat, 24 Feb 2007 22:33:59 +0000,

wrote:

In message , Christina Websell
writes

wrote in message
...
In message ,
writes
On Sat, 24 Feb 2007 15:01:52 +0000,

wrote:

In message ,
writes
On Fri, 23 Feb 2007 22:38:29 +0000,

wrote:

In message ,
writes
Press Release 19th Feb 2007

SHAMEFUL ADMISSION BY SCOTLAND'S SHOOTING INDUSTRY

LEAGUE AGAINST CRUEL SPORTS CONDEMNS TREATMENT OF GAME BIRDS

The Game Conservancy Trust has admitted the welfare of many game birds
was jeopardised this season by transporting the birds hundreds of
miles in hot weather.

I was sure you had always held the view that translocation wasn't
harmful to animals.

Are you suggesting you were wrong?




Since you've decided not to be sensible and discontinue posting your
rubbish,

Angus I do not consider giving in to attempts to brow beat, bully or
intimidate me into silence sensible. So in your terms no I haven't
decided to be sensible - which I assumes means I haven't given in to
your attempts to silence me ;-))))

I notice however your resorting to abuse is getting greater. Surely you
realise abuse is the last refuge of the coward and the bully.


Since you've decided not to be sensible and discontinue posting your
rubbish, I

Angus I do not consider giving in to attempts to brow beat, bully or
intimidate me into silence sensible. So in your terms no I haven't
decided to be sensible - which I assumes means I haven't given in to your
attempts to silence me ;-))))

I notice however your resorting to abuse is getting greater. Surely you
realise abuse is the last refuge of the coward and the bully.


I really do appreciate how you take him on so bravely. It might be the best
thing to do ignore completely now, yes?


I am sorry but now is not the time to ignore Angus.

At the moment he is trying to coerce/bully/intimidate me into not
posting.


I'm not trying to intimidate you Malcolm.


So you admit to the coercing and bullying :-))))))


You seldom post any meaningful responses and just act as a sock puppet
for Dr Thick with an endless flow of garbage such as the most recent
concerning relocation. You are comparing the relocation of hedgehogs
for their own benefit with the transport of pheasant chicks by truck
where large numbers die before they reach their destination. That is
just plain stupid.


Angus I am afraid that translocation is translocation. Calves
transported suffer sometimes from "transit fever" or shock pneumonia.

Why the animal as being moved doesn't remove the problem. The problem
remains.

You seem to think that because they are being moved "for their own good"
they will not suffer.

This is not so.


This I **WILL NOT** do.


Ok.


I am sorry for all concerned I have suggested that kill filing the pair
of us would be best as I intend to keep on for months or years rather
than be silenced.


Another stupid statement. If people do as you suggest, the effect
will be the same as not posting at all. :-))


As I have said in the past I have no objection to answering you posts
if they are not stupid sniping like the one above.


Angus I am not going to change usenet practice just because you don't
like it.

You appear to have snipped what Christina said and find that acceptable.

And you, like
Malcolm Ogilvie are not capable of arguing your case in a coherent
manner without attacking me on a personal basis - to which I shall
respond in.kind.


What personal attack have I launched?

You began the present situation by deciding that you were going to
answer all my posts with a one liner which was abusive of the person you
choose to call DR Thick.

I responded it kind.

I am quite happy that you either respond or not to my posts.

If you respond with abusive one liners etc. I will respond in kind.

If you don't respond fair enough. However when I ask a question and you
don't respond it is hard to know if you have missed the post or are
trying to avoid the post.

Can you suggest a way in which I will know?


I am quite happy to bring all this nonsense to a close if you are
prepared to post sensibly.


Angus I feel that all I do is use usenet. You have as does anyone else
the choice of responding or not.

I will respond if I feel I have a point to make or a question to ask.

If I am met by abuse to myself OR OTHERS I will respond in kind.


I am also not stupid enough to let this go on for "months or years".

Good. I however am if necessary.

Please read this carefully try to understand my point of view and then
either respond or not as you feel fit.

However I WILL NOT stop posting merely because you would like me to.

I am sorry that I have replied to a large number of posts before this.
That is due to the way my news reader presents them to me.

I shall not reply to any more of your cut and pastes in this session
until I see what sort of a reply ( or not ) I get to this post.
--
Malcolm Kane