Thread: This group
View Single Post
  #63   Report Post  
Old 25-02-2007, 03:40 PM posted to uk.rec.gardening
Stewart Robert Hinsley Stewart Robert Hinsley is offline
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by GardenBanter: Jul 2006
Posts: 1,811
Default This group

In message , Nick Maclaren
writes

In article ,
Stewart Robert Hinsley writes:
|
| DNA data has tomato deep within Solanum - in fact as closer to potatoes
| that are many other unquestioned species of Solanum - which is why the
| botanists have moved tomatoes back into Solanum.

Interesting. It doesn't surprise me - I never did understand why it
was separated, because there is so much in common. Anyway, that is
another "Who gives a damn?" reclassification, as it will cause no
confusion - after all, it is only reverting to an older usage,
except that I think that it was Solanum something-else :-)

| However, Solanum capsicum isn't chilli; it's Jerusalem Cherry. Chillis
| are Capsicum species, and belong to the same group of Solanaceae as
| Solanum, but within any concept of Solanum with any degree of
| acceptance.

Er, Star Capsicum, surely? Jerusalem Cherry is S. pseudocapsicum in
all my books. Or have the species been merged?


Perhaps I shouldn't believe all I read on the web, but hits for "Solanum
capsicum" were either coming up with Jerusalem Cherry, or wtih a list of
generic names. Maybe this is another case of the vagaries of vernacular
names. In any case Solanum capsicum is not a chilli.


Regards,
Nick Maclaren.


--
Stewart Robert Hinsley