In message , Sacha
writes
On 1/3/07 14:50, in article , "BAC"
wrote:
"Sacha" wrote in message
. uk...
On 1/3/07 10:28, in article ,
"charles" wrote:
snip
I have never met Sacha, but in her place I would do just the same.
The thing that absolutely amazes me, is that two women who so often make
crystal clear their thorough dislike of me would even consider wanting to
come to our home and make this ridiculous foot-stamping fuss about doing
something they don't want to do with someone they don't like!
If that's the case, then what's the point in going public on their banned
status?
I'm surprised at this. June & Anne are not the people I will not have here,
Thank you for telling us. I really believed I was one of those excluded
after the things you have said to and about me in ukfd and here. I am
pleased.
though after this display both would need the hides of rhinos to imagine
they would be actually welcomed with open arms! As both of them dislike me
so intensely,
I thought it was you who disliked me - after all, it was you who accused
me when we had been having a friendly email correspondence (I had
thought you liked me at last - silly me!) of weedling personal
information out of you so that I could in some peculiar way use it
against you. It was also you who accused me of 'cosying up' to Puce
against Judith - wrong again, Sacha but you wouldn't take my word for
it, would you? You called me hypocritical and when no-one listened to
you, you stormed out of ukfd in a huff, insulting almost everyone as you
went, only to re-appear a few days later as if nothing had happened.
I don't understand why they are making all this fuss, other
than the fact that both have made it clear that what they really want is a
fight.
Wrong again Sacha. Your original post about the meet has now proved to
be misleading and confusing. Never mind. I hope you all enjoy it.
Pathetic! It would be much more to the point, if they were thinking
of the good of this group, if they deplored the behaviour in this group
which led to me having to do this. Common sense would dictate that I am not
having in our home, people who have sworn at me, insulted me, virtually
stalked me and in one case harassed me for years.
Well,
AFAIK, I have not sworn at you, stalked you or harrassed you at
all, although I do remember a few months ago in ukfd typing in a post
that I couldn't give a flying f**k about what you were saying about me
(when you were being at your most insulting) but that is all.
--
June Hughes