I agree. I don't like the new format as much as the old, but I can't figure
out why. One thing that does annoy me is the back pages of the paper don't
meet the front, they're too short and not cut or folded properly somehow.
The front cover graphics and text are just not as attractive, either. The
information it contains is still useful, though.

Maybe if the makeover is to attract a younger readership then that's why I
don't like it -- me being an older (age 47) reader!

I don't think Garden News has e-mail, as I'd e-mail them my opinions (FWIW)
if they did.






"mick" wrote in message
...

"Kate Morgan" wrote in message
...

This publication has recently had a make over to "attract a younger
readership"
I now find there is far to much white paper showing, don't like it so
much.
Wondered what others think.
and


I subscribed to Garden News about a year ago and liked it, I have to
admit that I have two copies on the kitchen table not yet opened.I
cannot put my finger on what is wrong with it, nothing, maybe it is just
me losing interest

I subscribe to Garden News too . I chose to subscribe because having read
round all those available I thought it was the best all round and
reasonably
priced.

I have to admit the new format is not attracting me to read , and I dont
know why either.

I dont think I have lost interest in what it contains, just interest in
actually reading it. There is just something wrong with the paper at a gut
level, but I cant express it in words ( yet).

I also have two copies unread from the past two weeks - although I did
open
them and look through briefly over breakfast.
previously though I would have read over breakfast and then come home from
work and read the thing page to page at night! I have not doen the
latter.since they changed it.