In message , Charlie Pridham
writes

"Stewart Robert Hinsley" wrote in message
...
In message , Bob Hobden
writes

"Stewart Robert Hinsley" wrote...
Photographed in one of the wilder (woodland) areas at the University of
Liverpool Botanic Gardens, and I had assumed it was wild - there are
several other species growing wild there.

http://www.stewart.hinsley.me.uk/Images/Geran168.jpg (plant)
http://www.stewart.hinsley.me.uk/Images/Geran169.jpg (flowers)
http://www.stewart.hinsley.me.uk/Images/Geran179.jpg (flower)

Having checked Keble-Martin I'm suspecting a pale-flowered form of
Geranium phaeum.

Seems to be a problem with the Photos, the first is only the top bit and
the
last won't load at all.
However I would agree with you from what I can see.

The last is a typo. (Sorry!) Try

http://www.stewart.hinsley.me.uk/Images/Geran170.jpg

The problem with the first is presumably a problem with the network
connection between the hosting company and your computer.
--
Stewart Robert Hinsley

I agree with Bob, its either a Geranium phaeum or one of its hybrids like x
monocense Anglicum

Having cogitated on your responses, and have performed a little extra
research, I'm am in agreement that it is that, particular Geranium
phaeum var. lividum or Geranium x monacense nothovar anglicum. It's a
pity I don't have a face-on photograph of a flower as the petal length
to breadth ratio appears to be a convenient criterion for distinguishing
the taxa.

Thanks.
--
Stewart Robert Hinsley