wrote in message
...
On Sat, 30 Jun 2007 08:37:47 GMT, "Dutch" wrote:

wrote in message
news
On Sat, 30 Jun 2007 07:13:57 GMT, "Dutch" wrote:

wrote in message
m...
On Fri, 29 Jun 2007 22:13:38 GMT, "Dutch" wrote:

wrote in message
news:r8pa83l8bln8t9spkove3be0n2pa4ff210@4ax. com...
On Fri, 29 Jun 2007 17:49:06 GMT, "Dutch" wrote:

wrote
On Fri, 29 Jun 2007 08:23:12 GMT, "Dutch" wrote:

snarky unserious self-marginalized angie wrote

None are so blind as those who don't wish to see.

Now that's ironic.


Not in the slightest.

You've taken irony to new heights, along with snippish, poorly
thought-out
knee-jerk responding.


Not at all.

Like that.

If you can't understand the argument, I can't help you.

And again. Tip: you might start by articulating an argument.


I have already done so.

Summarize it for me, you're articulate, right?


I already have. Look back in the thread.

I can't find anything remotely resembling an argument. If it's there
please
copy and paste it into a new reply.


Look it up.

I looked through your messages on this thread. The few comments you made
that had any substance to them were refuted, like this one...

You:
We ALL kill wildlife in the course of our daily lives but the
difference is that some people deliberately take the decision to kill
them when there is no necessity to do so.

That appears to be a pillar of your position, and it is utter nonsense,
"necessity" in the statement is a deliberate misnomer. Most of the
consumption-impacts you cause are not "necessity" based.

If you didn't understand it before you're unlikely to understand it
now.

I understand perfectly, you enjoy posing as a great saviour of animals, it
feeds your ego.