GardenBanter.co.uk - View Single Post

JoeSpareBedroom · 26-09-2007, 04:50 AM posted to rec.gardens

Charlie wrote in message
...
On Wed, 26 Sep 2007 03:30:37 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote:

Charlie wrote in message
. ..
On Wed, 26 Sep 2007 03:19:56 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote:

Charlie wrote in message
m...
On Wed, 26 Sep 2007 02:55:02 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote:

Charlie wrote in message
news:ukhjf3dasjl9ikl8eiltnphhajg041scie@4ax. com...
On Wed, 26 Sep 2007 02:35:05 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote:

Charlie wrote in message
news:bkgjf3tu8rr4kqjt07ef5o4ipjbre0hfgp@4a x.com...
On Wed, 26 Sep 2007 01:40:13 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote:

Charlie wrote in message
newsqdjf3pqpevi77uhds7h57evd0gr20lq26@ 4ax.com...
On Wed, 26 Sep 2007 01:15:29 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote:

Charlie wrote in message
news:ttajf3dbvam8q031g9euqlruo7nqs0ekt ...
On Tue, 25 Sep 2007 20:43:08 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote:
Charlie wrote in message
news:ibsif31tb4trkcc8vpn35qiflabl9fm ...
On Tue, 25 Sep 2007 20:08:39 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote:

If Mrs. Fenton is like your typical WM shopper, she would
not
be
able
to
read the note.

Do you wear a necktie?

No. Why?

I assumed you didn't.

OK. Now, I'm supposed to ask why you assumed that.

Duh......yeah!

OK. Why did you assume I don't wear a necktie (except to weddings
and
funerals)?

Certainly, but first, another question, please?

WTF was that bit last weekend Charlie Carolan and then my
finding
the info on this website? Sometimes I don't understand the
gaming.
Inquiring minds want to know.

http://whois.domaintools.com/stockcommando.com

Just a small indulgence, por favor. My answer is dependant upon
your
response.

That information is supplied strictly on a need to know basis. You
don't.

Hmmmm......well then, neither do you need my answer.

Perhaps my assessment is correct and my original question stands.

Since your question was in no way related to the domain information,
you
last response makes no sense. No matter. I'm sure the necktie question
had
no rhyme or reason either.

My question is related to the domain information in that you hooked
it,
as a response, to a post I made to you.

My post:
Your response:

So yeah, it matters, in that one might assume that you were trying to
imply that I was Charlie Carolan, which is wrong.

And yeah, my question has rhyme and reason. You don't get it, just
like I didn't get your reference.

I'm talking now about your necktie question. I have no interest in the
domain question or anything related to it. So, unless you want to
explain
the necktie question, this game is now over.

Perhaps it is no longer a game. I asked a very serious question. Why
did you post two replies to my posts that insinuated that I was Charlie
Carolan? And then continue those insinuations in subsequent posts?

Do I have an accent or something? You will receive no further information
about that. Get it?

Oh yeah, I get it.

Old Joke...

Why do lawyers wear neckties?

To keep their foreskins from covering their heads.

Get it?

My first question has now been answered to my satisfaction. Are you
satisfied with your answer?

Your response matched my expectations.