View Single Post
  #2   Report Post  
Old 09-10-2007, 09:29 PM posted to uk.environment.conservation,uk.rec.birdwatching,scot.birds,uk.rec.gardening,uk.business.agriculture
Gloria Gloria is offline
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by GardenBanter: Aug 2007
Posts: 50
Default Four-legged friend or foe? Dog walking displaces native birds from natural areas

On Tue, 09 Oct 2007 11:00:46 -0700, "John M."
wrote:

On Oct 5, 10:32 am, Gloria wrote:
On Fri, 05 Oct 2007 09:17:54 +0100, Old Codger


I'm curious to know, who's Pete, why you found it necessary to change
pseudonyms here while replying to yourself.


Please don't overtly snipped the posts otherwise we lose the context,
and we don't do that kind of thing here.

Post put back where it belongs.

Four-legged friend or foe? Dog walking displaces native birds from
natural areas

Article Category Animal behaviour
Article Type Research-Article
DOI 10.1098/rsbl.2007.0374
Online Date Tuesday, September 04, 2007

http://tinyurl.com/2gbb2n

Abstract

Dog walking is among the world's most popular recreational activities,
attracting millions of people to natural areas each year with diverse
benefits to human and canine health. But conservation managers often
ban dog walking from natural areas fearing that wildlife will see dogs
as potential predators and abandon their natural habitats, resulting
in outcry at the restricted access to public land. Arguments are
passionate on both sides and debate has remained subjective and
unresolved because experimental evidence of the ecological impacts of
dog walking has been lacking. Here we show that dog walking in
woodland leads to a 35% reduction in bird diversity and 41% reduction
in abundance, both in areas where dog walking is common and where dogs
are prohibited. These results argue against access by dog walkers to
sensitive conservation areas.


Keywords
habituation, human disturbance, ecotourism, predation risk, domestic
dog
References
Bauman, A.E., Russell, S.J., Furber, S.E. & Dobson, A.J. 2001 The
epidemiology of dog walking: an unmet need for human and canine
health. Med. J. Aust. 175, 632–634.

Beale, C.M. & Monaghan, P. 2004 Human disturbance: people as
predation-free predators?. J. Appl. Ecol. 41, 335–343,
(doi:10.1111/j.0021-8901.2004.00900.x). [CrossRef]

Blackburn, T.M., Gaston, K.J., Quinn, R.M. & Gregory, R.D. 1999 Do
local abundances of British birds change with proximity to range
edge?. J. Biogeogr. 26, 493–505,
(doi:10.1046/j.1365-2699.1999.00298.x). [CrossRef]

Blumstein, D.T. 2006 The multipredator hypothesis and the evolutionary
persistence of antipredator behavior. Ethology 112, 209–217,
(doi:10.1111/j.1439-0310.2006.01209.x). [CrossRef]

Blumstein, D.T. & Daniel, J.C. 2005 The loss of anti-predator
behaviour following isolation on islands. Proc. R. Soc. B 272,
1663–1668, (doi:10.1098/rspb.2005.3147). [CrossRef]

Blumstein, D.T., Fernández-Juricic, E., Zollner, P.A. & Garity, S.C.
2005 Inter-specific variation in avian responses to human disturbance.
J. Appl. Ecol. 42, 943–953, (doi:10.1111/j.1365-2664.2005.01071.x).
[CrossRef]

Blumstein, D.T., Bitton, A. & DaVeiga, J. 2006 How does the presence
of predators influence the persistence of antipredator behavior?. J.
Theor. Biol. 239, 460–468, (doi:10.1016/j.jtbi.2005.08.011).
[CrossRef]

Hill, D., Hockin, D., Price, D., Tucker, G., Morris, R. & Treweek, J.
1997 Bird disturbance: improving the quality and utility of
disturbance research. J. Appl. Ecol. 34, 275–288,
(doi:10.2307/2404876). [CrossRef]

Keller, V. 1989 Variations in the response of great crested grebes
Podiceps cristatus to human disturbance—a sign of adaptation?. Biol.
Conserv. 49, 31–45, (doi:10.1016/0006-3207(89)90111-0). [CrossRef]

Lima, S.L. & Bednekoff, P.A. 1999 Temporal variation in danger drives
antipredator behavior: the predation risk allocation hypothesis. Am.
Nat. 153, 649–659, (doi:10.1086/303202). [CrossRef]

Lord, A., Waas, J.R., Innes, J. & Whittingham, M.J. 2001 Effects of
human approaches to nests of northern New Zealand dotterels. Biol.
Conserv. 98, 233–240, (doi:10.1016/S0006-3207(00)00158-0). [CrossRef]

Macdonald, D.W. & Sillero-Zubiri, C. 2004 Biology and conservation of
wild canids. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

Mitchell, B.D. & Banks, P.B. 2005 Do wild dogs exclude foxes? Evidence
for competition from dietary and spatial overlaps. Aust. Ecol. 30,
581–591, (doi:10.1111/j.1442-9993.2005.01473.x). [CrossRef]

Naidoo, R. & Adamowicz, W.L. 2005 Economic benefits of biodiversity
exceed costs of conservation at an African rainforest reserve. Proc.
Natl Acad. Sci. USA 102, 16712–16716, (doi:10.1073/pnas.0508036102).
[CrossRef]

Serpell, J. 1996 In the company of animals: a study of human–animal
relationships. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

Wood, L., Giles-Corti, B. & Bulsara, M. 2005 The pet connection: pets
as a conduit for social capital?. Soc. Sci. Med. 61, 1159–1173,
(doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2005.01.017). [CrossRef]
Advanced Search Find Search Builder Close | Clear Title (ti) Abstract
(ab) Author (au) ISSN (issn) DOI (doi) And Or Not ( ) * (wildcard)
Within all content
Within this journal
Export this article Export this article as RIS | Text

Text PDF
The size of this document is 92 kilobytes. Although it may be a
lengthier download, this is the most authoritative online format.

Open: Entire document

HTML
This offers the quickest access for ease of browsing. Please note that
some scientific and mathematical characters may not render as
precisely as in PDF versions.

Open Full Text