On Sat, 3 Nov 2007 11:57:19 +0000, Granity wrote
(in article ):


Stuart Noble

Depends on the size of the pic file you're uploading. Set your camera
to it's lowest resolution for pictures you're going to upload (e.g.
e-mail setting) and it's much quicker. Also quicker for the viewer to
download.


Oh certainly but sometimes with plants, quite a good bit of detail is
required and the quicker uploads don't always give that. Nonetheless,
it's
a terrifically useful site.

I reduce the picture dimensions via software because I always forget to

do it on the camera, but which of the 4 tinypic codes you paste into
your message isn't clear. In my case it should have been
-
[image: http://i12.tinypic.com/4qj0thi.jpg]-

rather than
-
http://tinyurl.com/2hxvl2-

I think...

It's certainly a useful facility for this type of newsgroup[/i]

Try http://photobucket.com/ instead of tinypic, you can post a link
straight to a full sized image for example: http://tinyurl.com/yryap9[/i][/color]


Can I add my "me too" to that. I much prefer Photobucket, and have far fewer
problems reading the images there.

(Nice pic by the way.)


--
Sally in Shropshire, UK
Burne-Jones/William Morris window in Shropshire church with conservation
churchyard:
http://www.whitton-stmarys.org.uk