View Single Post
  #57   Report Post  
Old 29-12-2007, 01:27 AM posted to alt.home.lawn.garden
Bosco Bosco is offline
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by GardenBanter: Nov 2007
Posts: 10
Default Global warming my ass!

On Fri, 28 Dec 2007 08:06:43 -0500, dgk wrote:

On Fri, 28 Dec 2007 00:53:06 -0600, Bosco wrote:

On Thu, 27 Dec 2007 10:32:27 -0800 (PST), z
wrote:

On Dec 26, 6:32*pm, Lar wrote:

This is how rightwing urban legends are built; piece by piece. Like
the legend that ""experts were equally convinced that the planet faced
a possible mini ice age from a cooling trend."

Here's a story Time Magazine ran in '74 http://www.time.com/time/magazine/ar...944914,00.html

Lar

If you're quoting Time Magazine as your climate "expert", you've
pretty much shot yourself in the mouth right at the start. Who does
that article quote as "scientists"? Well, Reid A. Bryson and Donald
Oilman, both of whom are now widely quoted AGAINST the concept of
global warming, and Kenneth Hare, who is quoted as saying that if the
drought continues people will go hungry, with no reference to cooling.
In fact, what Hare said re cooling was: "The slow cooling trend in
parts of the northern hemisphere during the last few decades is
similar to others of natural origin in the past, and thus whether it
will continue or not is unknown".

So, your "experts" who were so wrong and can't be believed, consist of
Time magazine, quoting two experts who now have built on their
previous erroneous stance by being widely quoted as saying there is no
global warming. Thanks, that's another point against those two what-
climate-change spokescritters.

See, it's this kind of dumbass logical inability to think straight,
for even the simplest arguments about who said what, demonstrated by
the what-climate-change brain trust again and again, in every single
post, which makes it impossible to take anything you guys say
seriously.


then don't
and
go home
or
go back to your circle jerk



Good rebuttal. That will win some debating points.


that's your problem ... winning debating points ... which pretty much
means you lost before you started.

You think it's a "debate" with this guy. It's not. He couldn't care
less about differring views he's only interested in spreading the
gosple according to Algore.

But hay, Thanks for playing.