In article ,
"Rod Speed" wrote:

Don Klipstein wrote:
In article , HeyBub wrote:
CJT wrote:

... and a very good thing that will be, too. Bush and his clan have
wrought enough destruction it'll take two terms of a Democrat just
to get things back close to normal.

If you're not with us, you're on the side of the terrorists.

I hope this is irony or some other class of humor!

Bush II got re-elected by being against the "terrorists" but
has gone through over 7 years, and over 6 of those after "9/11",
without capturing Osama bin Laden either dead or alive!

He has however ensured that there hasnt been another terrorist obscenity in
the US since 9/11

You know, the thing is that a criminal can do pretty much what they want
until they attract attention. Once the "heat" starts lookin' at you, it
is a whole other story. Maybe Osama had help with 9/11. maybe not. Maybe
it was just a coincidence that the neo-cons got just what they were
prayin' for. Fact is, Osama ain't theSoviet Union. He don't got no F-16,
no tomahawk missiles, no M1 Abrams tanks, and no freakin aircraft
carriers. Al Quaida is a gang man, a gang. If Bush didn't need a "War on
Terror" to keep the bucks flowin', Osama & CO. would be old news.
--

Billy

Bush, Cheney & Pelosi, Behind Bars
http://rachelcorriefoundation.org/site/
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Movemen...George_W._Bush