View Single Post
  #5   Report Post  
Old 23-02-2008, 10:46 AM posted to uk.rec.gardening
Nick Maclaren Nick Maclaren is offline
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by GardenBanter: Jul 2006
Posts: 1,752
Default anyone using mycorrhizae?


In article ,
Emery Davis writes:
|
| I could be more specific. What I want it for is to increase verticillium
| resistance, via stress reduction, in various Acer taxa. These plants
| are well known to form such symbiotic relationships, hence the
| discussion in the maple community (including the Maple Society,
| which I can attest is reasonably serious about the subject).

Ah. Not, THAT makes a LOT more sense. But you should always make it
clear that it is Acer you are talking about.

| I'm not quite sure what you mean by "induced naturally," the fungus
| is almost certainly present in the soil here in places, but I may have
| introduced it via plantings.

Oops. I meant "induced artificially".

| By "that species" do you mean fungus or plant? Americans in the
| maple trade have mentioned www.mycoapply.com as their source,
| there is anecdotal evidence there that these work well with A. palmatum
| anyway. ...
|
| And so, I am asking about the brand, and if anyone in our climate
| uses the stuff!

Fine. But, if I were to refer you to something that I was using for
blackwood, oak, beech, or growing truffles, it wouldn't help you at all.
I am not, but I thought about it and looked into it a little.


Aside (not to you): God. British botanical loons, again. So ignorant
that they pluralise the obviously Greek-derived word "mycorrhiza" to
"mycorrhizae". And the OED confirms that it is precisely a British
botanical delusion.

I still remember a speeling test at my first prep. school that foxed
everyone with "hippopotami" (he pronounced it "-MY". No, that is not
the correct plural, as several of us (aged 7) knew. Of course, it was
a common local wild animal, and not an exotic.


Regards,
Nick Maclaren.