"symplastless" wrote in message
...

"D. Staples" wrote in message
...

"sympleass" wrote in message
...



Oh, and by the way, yard man, the leaves show foliar fungus, not a
microelement deficiency.

Sure, just provide the data where that can be found.

Any biology, dendrology, plant physiology, tree disease text that you
never read, yard man.
Be specific and give me the page number where the data can be found for
the essential elements.

For a "Tree Biologist" you get an "F", wrong on both counts, and you
continue with this "essential elements" crap when it does not apply.


Don Staples - Consulting Salvage Hog
http://www.livingston.net/dstaples/Services/salvage.htm

Again, provide me with the data on opt. fertility levels for 17 essential
elements and blueberries. Please list page and paragraph where the
reviewed and published data can be found in international reviewed
publications. You have to provide same data. Not just because Don
Staples says so, but because work has been done, published and reviewed by
peers and such. Not here say but published data on opt. fert. for
blueberries and the research done to obtain this data.

Again, dumb ass, it was the identity of two problems, common to trees, that
you, a "consulting yard boy" should have known, yet did not. Fertility
levels had nothing to do with the original question, or the problem. I will
not play your dumb ass games, you are a fraud.


Sincerely,
John A. Keslick, Jr.
Consulting Yard Boy
http://home.ccidl.org/~treeman
and www.treeddictionary.com
Beware of so-called tree experts who do not understand tree biology.
Storms, fires, floods, earthquakes, and volcanic eruptions keep reminding
us that we are not the boss.
Some people will buy products they do not understand and not buy books
that will give them understanding.