In article ss,
"gunner" wrote:

"Isabella Woodhouse" wrote in message
...
In article
,
Billy wrote:

In article
,
Billy wrote:

Must have learned well from Monsanto and its multitude of name-saving
spinoffs.

See from woodhouse's post your still trying to find the conspiracy Billy.
BTW your research is still mostly wrong and lacking, but I'm glad you at
least figured out you were beating that dead horse. Still waiting on how
Ironite is posioning the earth.

First, I am not "Billy" as one can plainly see from the attribution.
Second, you have made a logical error in deducing any motive on Billy's
(or anyone else's) part from something I've said.

If you have a specific issue with something *I* said, then state your
facts. If you dispute something someone else says, then state your
facts in response to the post in question. And btw, just saying
someone's research is "wrong" or "lacking", absent any evidence, hardly
comprises an argument with legs.
--
"I will show you fear in a handful of dust"
-T.S. Eliot