In article ss,
"gunner" wrote:

"Isabella Woodhouse" wrote in message
...

Must have learned well from Monsanto and its multitude of
name-saving spinoffs.

See from woodhouse's post your still trying to find the conspiracy
Billy. BTW your research is still mostly wrong and lacking, but
I'm glad you at least figured out you were beating that dead
horse. Still waiting on how Ironite is posioning the earth.

First, I am not "Billy" as one can plainly see from the
attribution. Second, you have made a logical error in deducing any
motive on Billy's (or anyone else's) part from something I've said.
If you have a specific issue with something *I* said, then state
your facts. If you dispute something someone else says, then state
your facts in response to the post in question.

Please reread my first sentence again. This is not bout you. If
your name is not Billy, you did not need to respond back?

Learn to use Usenet. There are many FAQs. When you have something to
say to someone, the polite (not rude) thing to do is to respond to the
copy posted by *that* person--- not someone else. It's a very simple
concept.

It is not a self righteous indignation thing on your part, is it ?

How utterly silly and fictitious. But you amuse me as would a fly
drowning in the buttermilk.

I certainly did not mean to slight your interjection of a collusion
theory.

I interjected no such thing. You appear to have either a vivid
imagination or a need to pretend.

Besides, no, I'm not in error,.....

Normally, one puts a period at the end of a sentence, not a comma.

I never thought you really said anything.

Then it is your comprehension at issue, not mine.

This is not a challenge to your belief system,

My belief system is not at issue. It's a fact--- not a belief--- that
you responded to the wrong post.
[...]

I KF him ....

Am I supposed to care about that?

And btw, just saying
someone's research is "wrong" or "lacking", absent any evidence,
hardly comprises an argument with legs.

Conversely, just because someone infers some "fact" as he has done
in this entire thread, does not make it a fact...

Irrelevant to my posts.

Ironite Products Company is not located in GA....

Your topical argument is with someone else, not me. It is illogical
(not to speak of ridiculously convenient) to KF the posts with which you
disagree and then respond to uninvolved others instead--- as though they
could possibly give a rip. I certainly don't. Perhaps you are afraid
the OP will provide an argument you can't contest so it is easier to
post your dri....... uh.... thoughts to uninvolved parties. Perhaps
what you need is a controlled audience--- one that will delight in your
every word. What you need is a moderated NG.

Again, It is not my job to refute BS statements...

Your mode of employment is of no concern to me. If something seems "BS"
to you, then contest it with facts. Otherwise, it is *your* credibility
that is in question--- not the post you tag as "BS". I can just see
this arguendo before a judge:

You: "Your Honor, Counsel for the Plaintiff's argument is BS"

Judge: laughing "Hearing no facts to rebut the Plaintiff, this case
is dismissed."
--
"I will show you fear in a handful of dust"
-T.S. Eliot