Thread: Processed Foods
View Single Post
  #3   Report Post  
Old 18-09-2008, 01:47 AM posted to rec.gardens.edible
Billy[_5_] Billy[_5_] is offline
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by GardenBanter: Jul 2008
Posts: 503
Default Processed Foods

In article
,
Frank wrote:

On Sep 17, 1:09*am, Billy wrote:
Heart fears over common chemical
plastic packaging
Bisphenol A is commonly used in food packaging

Higher levels of a chemical often found in plastic food and drink
packaging are associated with cardiovascular disease and diabetes, a
study has suggested.

The group with the highest levels of Bisphenol A (BPA) in their urine
were found to be more than twice as likely to have diabetes or heart
disease.

But the Journal of the American Medical Association research did not
show that Bisphenol A caused the conditions.

And a UK toxicology expert stressed the study's findings were
"preliminary".

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/health/7612839.stm
--

Billy
Bush and Pelosi Behind
Barshttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9KVTfcAyYGg&ref=patrick.nethttp://www.haa
retz.com/hasen/spages/1016232.html


This was the article in local paper saying FDA still considers BPA
safe:

http://www.delawareonline.com/apps/p...=2008309170004

I've been following and have been concerned that BPA has demonstrated
undesirable effects in animals even at low concentration. OTOH, as a
polymer chemist, I worked with the stuff for years and probably had
exposure thousands of times beyond public with no ill effect. I know
of no epi studies with BPA workers and companies are obliged under
TSCA to disclose problems with workers.


I would think prudence would be in order. Even as the FDA (which has
been susceptible to the influence of lobbyists) was ducking a
definitive statement, it was telling people how to avoid BPAs.
"Right now, our tentative conclusion is that it's safe, so we're not
recommending any change in habits," said Laura Tarantino, head of the FDA's
office of food additive safety. But she acknowledged, "there are a number of
things people can do to lower their exposure."

For example, consumers can avoid plastic containers imprinted with the
recycling number '7,' as many of those contain BPA. Or, said Tarantino, they
can avoid warming food in such containers, as heat helps to release the
chemical.


"Right now, our tentative conclusion is that it's safe, so we're not
recommending any change in habits," said Laura Tarantino, head of the
FDA's office of food additive safety. But she acknowledged, "there are a
number of things people can do to lower their exposure."

For example, consumers can avoid plastic containers imprinted with the
recycling number '7,' as many of those contain BPA. Or, said Tarantino,
they can avoid warming food in such containers, as heat helps to release
the chemical."

BPA isn't toxic in the arsenic sense of the word but it is classified
by "some" as a endocrine disrupter.

For those who are concerned about BPA I would suggest
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bisphenol_A and
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Endocrine_disruptor.
--

Billy
Bush and Pelosi Behind Bars
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9KVTf...ef=patrick.net
http://www.haaretz.com/hasen/spages/1016232.html