In article ,
"symplastless" wrote:

"Billy" wrote in message
...
In article

Sorry Chris, counselors, or medical practitioners, nutritionists may be
but they aren't biologists, chemists, or physicists. Just because some
of them may use a term to define a condition doesn't mean that the term
is based in the hard sciences. The term may have meaning to them but is
meaningless to the greater scientific community.

So why not call an element an element and something with energy a nutrient,
as long as it contains elements.

John, everything has energy (potential or kinetic). Physicists tell us
that even a void has energy but in our world, energy from the Sun is
captured in reduced carbon dioxide bonds which incorporates water into
the process. This is done by chlorophyl and is stored as a form of
glucose. It is the energy from the re-oxidation of these carbon bonds
that is responsible for all eucaryotic (cells with membranes around the
nucleus) life on the planet.
--

Billy
Bush and Pelosi Behind Bars
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9KVTf...ef=patrick.net
http://www.haaretz.com/hasen/spages/1016232.html