View Single Post
  #33   Report Post  
Old 07-11-2008, 02:15 PM posted to alt.home.lawn.garden
Lawn Guy Lawn Guy is offline
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by GardenBanter: Oct 2008
Posts: 57
Default Which is better for the lawn over the winter?

Eggs Zachtly ) wrote:

X-NoArchive: YES


What kind of chicken-shit coward are you?

Why are you afraid of google archiving your posts?

No, dumbass. They obviously claimed that what they quoted was the
worst lawn advice they'd ever seen. They were correct. Please try
and keep up.


Why don't you let Bob F respond, instead of putting words in his mouth.

It's a fact that municipal gov'ts do not want to see cut grass
taking up valuble space in landfills so they invent new propaganda
that leaving clippings on the lawn is better for your lawn.


Source? Other than your own feeble mind, of course.


Practically all internet searches on the topic of grass cutting will
return content claiming that by not bagging your grass, that you're
reducing the amount of material going to landfill.

It's a fact that you will need to mow more frequently if you don't
bag your grass.


No. It's a fact that you need to mow your lawn as often as needed,


Yes it is. You must not cut more than 1/3 of the grass blade if you
want the cut blade to decay at ground level. Any longer and it will
decay at or near the lawn surface, and most of it's nutrients will be
consumed by bacteria or other organisms (or will blow away in the wind
or storm water runoff) and not returned to the soil.

In most cases, not cutting more than 1/3 of the blade means cutting your
grass more frequently at peak growing times - usually every 5 days. And
in fact, even proponents of leaving the clippings on the lawn recommend
raking / bagging during peak growing periods.

Are you saying that if you bag it, you can just let it grow
longer, and cut more off of it?


Yes, I do let my grass grow longer, and I usually do cut more than 1/3
of the blade during peak growing periods. I usually cut my grass every
7 to 10 days - never more frequently. And the grass looks great.

Bullshit. Or, are you the only one that's right, and the major
universities that specialize in turf care management are wrong?


It's politically incorrect to be a proponent of bagging your grass and
nobody will fund a research project that proves the benefits of bagging
your grass.

-----------------
"Grass clippings from mowing do not contribute to thatch. However, once
a thatch layer has developed, clippings may speed its formation."

http://extension.missouri.edu/explor...ort/G06708.htm
-----------------
"Despite popular belief, short clippings dropped on the lawn after
mowing are not the cause of thatch buildup. Clippings are very high in
water content and breakdown rapidly when returned to lawns after mowing,
assuming lawns are mowed on a regular basis (not removing more than
one-third of the leaf blade)."

http://www.urbanext.uiuc.edu/lawnchallenge/lesson5.html

So "short clippings" are not the cause of thatch buildup. Ok, what
about "long clippings" then?
-----------------

Any detailed source of information on thatch will always say that
"SHORT" clippings don't contribute to thatch, or that "FREQUENT" grass
cutting is required to prevent thatch buildup.

-------------------
"Approximately one quarter of a lawn’s fertilizer need can be met by
recycling grass clippings."

http://hoke.ces.ncsu.edu/index.php?page=news&ci=LAWN+6

So that dispells the myth that the lawn can receive all, or even the
majority, of it's nutrition from grass clippings. Some people claim
that their lawn gets all the nutrition it needs from the grass
clippings. They are obviously wrong.

The "don't bag your grass" crowd has given some people the idea that
fertilizer isin't needed.
-------------------

The truth is, grass clippings left on lawns will probably be blown away
onto nearby roads and get washed away in storm water runnoff. The
cuttings disappear, and most people think it's going down to the soil
surface, but I bet most of it ends up in storm sewers or roadside
ditches.

On the internet, many proponents of leaving the clippings on the grass
are lawn maintainence company web pages. Naturally, it's easier,
cheaper and faster for them to leave the clippings when they cut their
customer's lawns, so I'm not surprised that they would rather leave the
clippings on the lawn and say it's good or desirable.

Truth is, it's probably better for the ecology to bag and compost your
grass vs leaving the clippings on the grass for them to dry up and get
blown away and eventually end up in streams and rivers taking their
fertilizer and herbicide residues with them.

You obviously don't know shit about thatch,


You know, I don't have a thatch problem. Because I BAG my grass.

I don't care what you say about thatch. Unless you have a lawn that
you've been bagging for 5 to 10 years, you can't say that bagging your
grass does, or does not, reduce thatch.

If all those experts, if all those university studies, are ALWAYS
dealing with lawns where the clippings are left on the lawn, then how
can they say that bagging DOESN'T reduce thatch ??? To do a proper
test, you need to compare 2 lawns, side-by-side, where one lawn was
always bagged (at least for 5 seasons) and the other one wasn't. Show
me that study. I bet it doesn't exist.

I don't have thatch. I can see right down to the soil surface. I've
never de-thatched.

You want a healthy lawn?

You don't like cutting your lawn every 5 days?

You don't like it when dried up grass is blown around, on your driveway,
your front porch, being tracked into your house or garage?

Then bag your grass.

I can guarantee that your lawn doesn't look near as good
as any area of our course.


And I don't spend a fortune on fertilizer and water either.

Golf courses spend huge on water and fertilizer and pesticides and
herbicides.

It's just plain stupid to compare the care and maintenance of
residential lawns to golf courses. Different grasses, different uses,
different budgets.