The message
from Chris Hogg contains these words:

If their reader can't handle HTML and reading it upsets them, perhaps
they should consider upgrading to a better reader. There are bound to
be people who post in HTML occasionally, whether accidentally or
otherwise.

IMO my reader is superior to any other I have tried. The only deficiency
I it has ATM is seeing and translating some of the less-used character
formats. Howeer, this is in-hand.

--
Rusty
Direct reply to: horrid dot squeak snailything zetnet point co period uk
Separator in search of a sig