The message
from animaux contains these words:

On Sat, 22 Feb 2003 23:43:32 GMT, Janet Baraclough

wrote:

Jackson's defenders might ask themselves why he deliberately chose to be
interviewed by a UK TV journalist who is most famous for his TV
interview with Princess Diana about her adulterous failed marriage; in
which she too was excruciatingly self-revelatory, indiscreet and
deliberately publicity-seeking.

Janet.

Such anger.

Such incomprehension. Try reading it again.

I suppose you didn't see Jackson's camera view of what really was
said and took place during the formal interviews of the documentary.
He allowed
this particular journalist to do it because he "thought" he was
dealing with a
journalist, not a sensationalist who was writing for the tabloids...or
in that
sensational style at the very least.

Sigh. Bashir's sensation-causing interview with Diana was on TV, not
in a tabloid. MJ employs both security and PR staff so it just isn't
credible that he was unaware of the main item in Bashir's career
history.

BTW, Prince Charles was cheating on Dianna from way back before they were
married.

Next you'll be telling us she's going to die in a car crash.

Janet