On 26/2/09 11:41, in article ,
" wrote:

In article ,
BAC wrote:

Mabbett had trouble getting along with many many more people on Usenet than
just Mike Crowe, and there is no denying that many people, rightly or
wrongly, regarded him as the worst and most infuriating sort of netnanny
troll. ...

Not quite. He was mildly irritating, but he did NOT go in for what he
was claimed to do - I checked. What happened was that some particularly
nasty trolls started picking on him, and that snowballed - in the same
way that beating up cripples used to be a common sport.

Precisely so. To start with, he fell foul of Crowe because he and several
others objected to Crowe spamming several groups to advertise a non-related
'service'. Whereas others simply killfiled Crowe, Andy stood his ground and
was pilloried for it. His personal life and his working life were all
dragged into a vicious and spiteful vendetta from Crowe.

Andy knows a lot about gardening and net-nannying aside was a very popular
member of this group. The treatment he received was absolutely disgraceful
and shows the lengths a petty, spiteful little nobody like Crowe will go to
when he can't get his own way. IMO, he is a detestable vulgarian whose sole
interest in this group and others is to be as rude and objectionable as he
can be.
snip
--
Sacha
http://www.hillhousenursery.com
South Devon
Exotic plants, shrubs & perennials online