View Single Post
  #11   Report Post  
Old 19-05-2009, 04:48 PM posted to uk.rec.gardening
Broadback[_2_] Broadback[_2_] is offline
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by GardenBanter: Mar 2009
Posts: 138
Default Is this tree likely to be a threat?

K wrote:
echinosum writes
The largest subsidence risk results from the combination of
(1) deciduous trees
(2) clay soils
See for example
http://tinyurl.com/qhkzz5


Thank you - a heartwarming link (for someone in a clay soil which is not
London clay, in a pre-1900 house which is not detached)

" * Detached properties have a greater susceptibility to subsidence
or heave damage than non-detached properties.
* Properties built prior to 1900 are less susceptible to damage than
those built thereafter
* London clay is, by far, the most commonly encountered "problem" soil.
* It typically takes about 50 years between construction and
perception of damage, while only about 6% of cases occurred in the first
10 years after construction.
* The likelihood of a property being underpinned following damage
generally increases with the level of damage
* Oak trees are, by far, the most damaging species of tree. "

Still feel I did the right thing in persuading the Church to cut back
their beech tree (3m from our house) so that its branches no longer
sweep our roof tiles ;-)

Also be aware that cutting down trees can cause problems. Extensive
roots rot then the soil shifts to fill the holes. Three Houses near
where I used to live had problems after three large trees were felled.

--
Please reply to group,emails to designated
address are never read.