On Wed, 20 May 2009 22:01:38 +0100, Martin wrote:

Delta wrote:
On Wed, 20 May 2009 21:41:55 +0100, Martin wrote:

David wrote:

[1] http://www.aaemonline.org/gmopost.html


[2] David Schubert, personal communication to H. Penfound, Greenpeace
Canada, October 25, 2002.


[3] Irina Ermakova, “Genetically modified soy leads to the decrease
of weight and high mortality of rat pups of the first generation.
Preliminary studies,” Ecosinform 1 (2006): 4–9.


[4] Irina Ermakova, “Experimental Evidence of GMO Hazards,”
Presentation at Scientists for a GM Free Europe, EU Parliament,
Brussels, June 12, 2007
None of which actually describe peer reviewed double blinded trials.
Don't ANY of the scientists you quoted actually do any science?

shit... are rats that clever now you need to do double blind research on
them....?

No, it's to stop bias in the researcher. It's the same with homeopathy
studies, when the researchers 'know' what the results should be, then they
see the results they expect. If they are blinded then the so-called
science is shown up for what it is, a total scam.

What kind of scientist 'publishes' findings through the press and the EU
parliament? If the science can't stand up to peer review it isn't science.

Horizontal gene transfer proven fact. Look it up yourself.