"JoeSpareBedroom" wrote in message
...
"brooklyn1" wrote in message
...

"JoeSpareBedroom" wrote in message
...
"brooklyn1" wrote in message
...

"FarmI" ask@itshall be given wrote in message
...
"brooklyn1" wrote in message
"FarmI" ask@itshall be given wrote in message
"brooklyn1" wrote in message
"Phisherman" wrote:

To look their best roses require regular maintenance. I love
roses,
but only have three and that is enough work for me.

I feel the same, roses are a lot of work,

If you think that, then you don't know about the whole range of
roses that are available. Many roses need no care at all.

It is the roses that need no care that this thread is about.


That's right... wild roses are the only roses that need no care,
instead they need beware. Um, we were doing just fine, you're the
one who introduced the fancy schmacy roses into this thread, so go
sit on a thorn while you repent..

Sheldon, you're an idiot and it's been established by now that you
have the brains of a jellyfish.

If you knew anything at all on the subject, you wouldn't write such
stupid things.
You never grew a rose, you never will... YOU NEVER GREW ANYTHING... YOU
ARE A DIRTY STINKING LIAR, A TOTAL FRAUD! Farm1 = FAKE1 has never ever
been a hundred miles of a farm.


Sheldon, somewhere in your room is a button you can push to call the big
burly male nurse who will strap you down and medicate you again.

Push the button, Sheldon.

The typical AVOIDANCE response of yet another LIAR who has NEVER grown
anything.

Happy wild rugusa:
http://i44.tinypic.com/2iqbiqc.jpg

http://i44.tinypic.com/akh9u8.jpg


Where in your fantasy world did you imagine

Those photos are no fantasy, they're real... your snide remarks mean you're
obviously envious.

that a homeowner would not prune a Rosa rugosa?
WTF does "homeowner" have to do with it... must be a freudian slip because
you rent, most likely a dinky dingy tenement apt... the only gardening you
do is on your keyboard.