On Oct 18, 4:25*pm, Sacha wrote:
On 2009-10-18 13:31:23 +0100, aquachimp
said:
On Oct 18, 2:00*pm, "'Mike'" wrote:
Where have the gardener's 'wages' been coming from???????
The gardener has just been 'an expense'.
A 'claimable' one of course ;-)
;-)))
--
Mike
The Royal Naval Electrical Branch Association
www.rneba.org.uk
Luxury Self Catering on the Isle of Wight?
www.shanklinmanormews.co.uk
hmm, interesting, but I'm still not there.
You see, in your explanation there is no scandal, so the 'scandal' of
legitimate garden expenses will not be standing 'against' said PM
http://www.guardian.co.uk/politics/2...nses-duck-isla...
--
Sachawww.hillhousenursery.com
Shrubs & perennials. Tender & exotics.
South Devon
Aaaaaaaaaaaah; I didn't know about gardening expenses in general.
Still, the sums now allowable (£1000/yr) seem rather modest. I mean,
if you have an office or factory, how much of ground maintenance can
you put against your taxes? The lot, I would have though and that
would surely work out at more than £20 /week.
But back to the cartoon; It's the, dare I say, gardener-in-pretence-
of-working that is supposedly going to stand against the MP, not the
garden, nor its costs. So is the link supposed to be between the non-
work of an MP and the non-work of a gardener? Does the cartoonist
think professional gardeners make their monies as easily as MPs?