A real scientist, not one with shares.

I'm sure you know who said it.



if you had any grasp on science you would know that consensus is not a
word that is used in the world of science. One thousand people could
support your theory or supposition, and one person can falsify it and
completely destroy it.

Since the IPCC has observed in its 2001 report that of all the CO2 in the
atmosphere, only 4% is of anthropogenic origin. Another recent report has
indicated that this ratio of natural to anthropogenic CO2 has remained the
same for over 15 years.

So, you could take every one off this planet, and every trace of them ever
being here, and reduce the amount of CO2 in the atmosphere by only 17 ppm,
which considering there is currently 388 ppm, is bugger all.

An ETS will not help this situation, nor anything that man can do, what we
need is the courage and sense to do nothing.

"David Hare-Scott" wrote in message
...

"Jonno" wrote in message
...





Well I suggest that you keep looking. So far all you are finding are
sites (such as the above and junkscience.com) run by contrarians and
lobbyists. Why won't you read anything by actual climate scientists?

David

The truth is always surrounded by some mistruth.
You have to wade thru a lot of crap to get to the truth.
At least I was looking.

More than many citizens are doing. Have you considered also reading
sources other than from contrarians and lobbyists?

David

If you could come up with something we may get there.


Try this:

http://www.realclimate.org/

It's run by actual climate scientists

David