Youre a very uppity type person, and youre fooling no one...

On 20/01/2010 6:00 PM, David Hare-Scott wrote:
Jonno wrote:

I notice that you have now abandoned the issues raised by Coleman
altogether. I didn't think that they were wrth too much more effort
either.

Measuring temperature?
See how its done...

http://jonova.s3.amazonaws.com/sh1/t...ook_2-3_lq.pdf


This climate change sceptic looks a little more reasonable than most
of the sources that you have found for us. At least not so obviously
wrong as Coleman. But before we play another round of whackamole
(which I am getting tired of) let me ask you this. Did you do any
research to see if her arguments stand up? Did you look to see if the
debunker had been debunked? If not you are ignoring her advise on page
one. This does not need to be an adversarial situation you know, you
could check these things out yourself.

The above will show you how crazy this situation has become....
I know nothing, you know nothing.

If one can cause enough FUD you can paralyse decision making. There
are those who would like you to feel helpless but you can resist by
using your intellect. I repeat my invitation for you to do so.

We are all fed through a filtered straw of newspapers, run by
politically influenced reports.
Think, out of the box (I hate that saying too), before we all get put
into one..


Lead the way by doing something other than posting denial propaganda.

A statistician and a mathematical genius were interviewed for a job.
Asked what 1000 and 1000 added together equalled, the mathematician
answered, without referring to his calculator that two thousand was
the usual answer.
The statistician, closed the curtains, pulled out his scientific
calculator, which he'd previously brought from Kmart at a reduced
price, and asked, "what would you like it to be?"


Ho ho ho. All the arguments about long term trends are necessarily
statistical. Deal with it.


That folks is what we are dealing with here.
Were using ALGore Rhythms.

Very droll.

David

--