On 20/01/2010 6:00 PM, David Hare-Scott wrote:
Jonno wrote:

I notice that you have now abandoned the issues raised by Coleman
altogether. I didn't think that they were wrth too much more effort
either.
No, I havent. The guys on the level, and so is the matter at hand. He's
completely correct! His issues stand!


Measuring temperature?
See how its done...

http://jonova.s3.amazonaws.com/sh1/t...ook_2-3_lq.pdf


This climate change sceptic looks a little more reasonable than most
of the sources that you have found for us. At least not so obviously
wrong as Coleman. But before we play another round of whackamole
(which I am getting tired of) let me ask you this. Did you do any
research to see if her arguments stand up? Did you look to see if the
debunker had been debunked? If not you are ignoring her advise on page
one. This does not need to be an adversarial situation you know, you
could check these things out yourself.

Not necessarily possible, Who controls the data! You should be more
reasonalbe and logical.
Your sound like the argument booth in Monthy python.
Youre not backing of some are you?
The above will show you how crazy this situation has become....
I know nothing, you know nothing.

If one can cause enough FUD you can paralyse decision making. There
are those who would like you to feel helpless but you can resist by
using your intellect. I repeat my invitation for you to do so.
We are all fed through a filtered straw of newspapers, run by
politically influenced reports.
Think, out of the box (I hate that saying too), before we all get put
into one..


Lead the way by doing something other than posting denial propaganda.
Propaganda is what others use.
Prove this global warming as man made and youre doing something
"Intellectual". You cant!!!!!
And seeing these people are not out to prove anything, the ones who are
trying to raise funds, (like ilk being speed camera governments,
Remember the Sheriff of Nottingham?) should do so.
Meanwhile all the polluters are getting away scott free. Make the public
pay? Not this little black duck, we fight back!

BTW the Himalayan Glacier melting theory has now been found to be
critically impossible to implement, due to the lack of heat.
2035 the year I believe it was. DEBUNKED! But thats only one. But can
you see the reason for them chucking this into the equation?
The more lies the better.
BTW Worst winter for a long time in the northern part of the globe.
Just a blip on my compass, but overall very encouraging.....

A statistician and a mathematical genius were interviewed for a job.
Asked what 1000 and 1000 added together equalled, the mathematician
answered, without referring to his calculator that two thousand was
the usual answer.
The statistician, closed the curtains, pulled out his scientific
calculator, which he'd previously brought from Kmart at a reduced
price, and asked, "what would you like it to be?"


Ho ho ho. All the arguments about long term trends are necessarily
statistical. Deal with it.
Father Christmas, you're ho ho hoing too early...I am dealing with it
and seeing it for what is is: a global scam made all the more disgusting
by touts like yourself..
Youre painting yourself into a creditability corner.. I MAY BE ABLE to
reveal who you are soon enough...
There are people who could be interested.
I am sad others havent backed me so far.
I guess they havent the time to do so.


That folks is what we are dealing with here.
Were using ALGore Rhythms.

Very droll.
Glad you like it.
You couldnt have thought of it.

David

--