"David Hare-Scott" wrote in message
...
Frank wrote:
On 1/21/2010 11:04 PM, David Hare-Scott wrote:
aluckyguess wrote:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2TOFe85cmAE

I am not a voter for your congress but I would hope that my elected
representatives were more perceptive and informed than the speaker in
this clip. Being unable to distinguish between climate and weather
does not fill me with confidence that the speaker understands
anything about climate change.

David

That's the knee jerk argument.

I don 't understand that comment. What is knee-jerk about saying a person
who doesn't understand the difference between weather and climate is
ignorant? What is knee-jerk about wanting my representatives to be
perceptive and informed?

My skepticism comes in as to how much
weather change is man made vs just what mother nature does.

Weather does change all the time. We need to consider if the earth's
climate is changing and if so why. These are two different issues.

We hear
other planets in our solar system are also warming and I don't think
anybody there are driving SUV's.

Where did you hear that? Assuming for moment that the climate was
changing on other planets from natural causes why would that show that
climate is not changing on earth from human causes?

We know that the earth's climate has changed in the past naturally and it
may well do so again. That by itself says nothing about whether it *is*
doing so naturally this time. This question has been much studied and
there is considerable evidence available that points to the cause this
time being human activity.

It does not, there is nowhere that proves it has anything to do with human
activity.
It actually proves otherwise. We may have polluted the planet with things
that can cause us harm, but as far us having anything to do with
climate or weather change there is not one bit of factual evidence. The
Earth has been warming since the ice age, and it's the least of our
problems. Mr. Gore should focus more on herbicides and other chemicals that
pollute the planet.