On 8/02/2010 9:45 AM, David Hare-Scott wrote:
Terryc wrote:
Jonno wrote:
Winter report from Europe...
Holland to be exact... Global warming on the increase?

Yep, fits right in.

Sure does :-)

For a multi-alias propagandist who doesn't understand the difference
between climate and weather.

D
Show me?
Now it seems I've gone up in the world. Thank you for your apparent
attempt at explaining what I do. I didnt realise. What a relief...
Weather and climate They are both interelated, and the argument
is over you said... I use the interchangeble. You like to jump in it to
ridicule. When people loose they often resort to this method. I dont
think youre very nice!

Just because you only know how to use one computer, I use a few...As i
explained before, otherwise I would deny the fact.

You who doesnt WISH to understand why scientists need to explain, also
appear to haul in a few names but you dont tell....

There is NO need for carbon credits as CO2 effects stop being effective
and cannot increase its effects after its reached a certain level. What
part of that dont you understand?
What part cant you understand? Are you all that bright?

O boy, if you could only read and understand.
Try again... Youve failed miserably in the past.
BTW this garden.aud is part of the intranet, and as such is seen over
quite a large network ALL over the world....
I dont see to many disagreeing besides self interested people.
Whereas I have no pecuniary interest...


The sole support for AGW is the climate models, and the sole support for the

climate models with respect to CO2 is the forcing parameter.

There is no actual physical rational for the forcing parameter, because
it was simply

contrived from the assumption that observed warming of 0.6°C was due
entirely to a 100ppmv

increase in atmospheric CO2 concentration.

There was never any verification of this parameter either by theory or
observation.

There is no justification for this parameter based on the physical
properties of CO2,

because the molecular configuration of the CO2 molecule precludes any
significant effect

from CO2 beyond a concentration of 300ppmv, and the current
concentration is 386ppmv.

What this means in laymans terms is:
even if we double the CURRENT CO2 concentrations, warming wouldnt double triple or otherwise increase.
It stays the SAME as it is now. I can see that we cannot easily reduce the carbon level.