"alan.holmes" wrote in message
...

"Qwight" wrote in message
...
On Mon, 22 Feb 2010 18:17:16 -0000, "'Mike'"
wrote:


The owner has stated that he is more than
willing to replace it with more suitable trees. In fact he has suggested
more suitable ones to be planted AT HIS EXPENSE, note that AT HIS
EXPENSE,
if said tree is felled.

But earlier you said:

No it's not a diseased tree, belongs to the council on council land and
needs to come out of it on health and safety to life, property and limb
grounds.

So which of your statements was the lie?

What teh F*** are you telking about?

Probably the fact that one statement refers to the council owning the tree,
and the other gives the impression of a single individual owner.

Replacing a tree does not make the new one a health and safety problem!

I don't know - it might be replaced with a lupin.

--
Kathy