View Single Post
  #74   Report Post  
Old 25-02-2010, 09:40 AM posted to uk.rec.walking,uk.rec.gardening,uk.rec.birdwatching,misc.consumers.frugal-living,alt.rec.hiking
Phil Cook Phil Cook is offline
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by GardenBanter: Jul 2009
Posts: 192
Default walking boots-- which are good?

Rod Speed wrote:

SMS wrote:
Phil Cook wrote:

What everybody agrees upon, experts and laymen alike, is that boots
or shoes that start uncomfortable will never become comfortable.
Fit, fit and fit are the important things, all else is supplementary.


If the boots are full-grain leather then there can be a break-in period where they become more comfortable.


There can indeed and that does in fact happen routinely.

And it doesnt have to be 'full-grain' leather either.

But for cheaper boots of nubuck, suede, or fabric, they probably won't become more comfortable than they are at the
time of purchase.


Suede does too, its leather with the best of them.


Suede is leather with the best bit thrown away. It is the inner side
of the skin with the outer taken off. Nubuck is the outer that has
been abraded to resemble suede. Full grain leather has the outer
intact. A lot of winter boots intended for rough conditions are made
with the reverse side out to protect the face of the leather from
wear.
--
Phil Cook, last hill: Am Bodach in the Mamores on a sunny day :-)
pictures at http://www.therewaslight.co.uk soonish...