On Apr 28, 8:55*am, Dinosaur_Sr
wrote:
On Apr 28, 5:53*am, "dene" wrote:





"Alan Baker" wrote in message

...

In article

Maybe you should read my post before you respond. One thing for sure.
I can't talk to someone who doesn't understand what I say. For
example, I never said water quality had anything to do with malaria..
Either you are a sack of hammers or a troll.

Speaking of a troll, read the following.....

You said (and I quote):

"if the money wasted on DDT were spent on water quality, hundreds of
millions would not get malaria"

How can that be interpreted in any other way but that you said that
water quality *does* have something to do with malaria?

--
Uncle Al, the kiddy's pal
Vancouver, British Columbia

-Greg

I generally don't read Baker. He is one of those people who absolutely
refuses to understand what people are saying in their posts.

If Al or John don't understand what I said in that post, that's their
problem. It's pretty clear what I am saying. It just stands as a good
example of why you shouldn't respond to such people at all...a level
of consciousness thing, IMHO.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

The fact is that you said increased spending on water quality would
reduce the incidence of malaria in the developing world. Either
explain it or admit that it's wrong. That's a little tougher than
suggesting that I'm dumb or obstuse, isn't it?