In article ,
Frank wrote:

On 5/6/2010 7:29 AM, Bill who putters wrote:
Op-Ed Columnist
New Alarm Bells About Chemicals and Cancer



By NICHOLAS D. KRISTOF
Published: May 5, 2010

The President¹s Cancer Panel is the Mount Everest of the medical
mainstream, so it is astonishing to learn that it is poised to join
ranks with the organic food movement and decla chemicals threaten our
bodies.

The cancer panel is releasing a landmark 200-page report on Thursday,
warning that our lackadaisical approach to regulation may have
far-reaching consequences for our health.

I¹ve read an advance copy of the report, and it¹s an extraordinary
document. It calls on America to rethink the way we confront cancer,
including much more rigorous regulation of chemicals.

Traditionally, we reduce cancer risks through regular doctor visits,
self-examinations and screenings such as mammograms. The President¹s
Cancer Panel suggests other eye-opening steps as well, such as giving
preference to organic food, checking radon levels in the home and
microwaving food in glass containers rather than plastic.

more at

http://www.nytimes.com/2010/05/06/op...ristof.html?hp


As a retired chemist, chemo-phobia has always been a sore point with me.
"President's cancer panel" smells of politics.

As a still working chemist, you strike me as a nut-case, Frank.

If you were a scientist, you know that you should first show that the
"President¹s Cancer Panel" is engaging in and, disseminating a phobia,
before engaging in "seat of the pants" smell evaluations.


There are already several international recognized authorities that are
essentially apolitical.

Corporate then? Wouldn't that be ducky, for them, not us.

http://guidance.echa.europa.eu/docs/...ell_guidance_c
sa_en.pdf
--
- Billy
"Fascism should more properly be called corporatism because it is the
merger of state and corporate power." - Benito Mussolini.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Arn3lF5XSUg
http://www.thirdworldtraveler.com/Zinn/HZinn_page.html