The myth of food production "efficiency" in the "ar" debate
On 5/23/2010 11:54 PM, Rupert wrote:
On May 19, 6:07 am, "Fred C.
wrote:
On 5/18/2010 12:46 PM, Rupert wrote:
On May 19, 12:40 am, "Fred C.
wrote:
On 5/18/2010 2:18 AM, Rupert wrote:
On May 18, 8:13 am, wrote:
On May 17, 9:51 pm, wrote:
It takes a smaller amount of land to feed the human population on a
plant-based diet than on an animal-based diet. What I said was
obvious, thank you.
While your claim might be theoretically correct, it ignores the fact
that all land is not arable and some non-arable land can be used for
grazing.
I doubt that that would affect the final outcome.
It certainly does.
Do you have some data to back that up?
Shove it, rupie - you know there is non-arable land used for grazing.
We're talking about the proposition "It takes a smaller amount of land
to feed the human population on a plant-based diet than on an animal-
based diet"
We're not, ****wit.
|