On Mon, 16 Aug 2010 14:38:23 +0100, "Kate Morgan"
wrote:

The hypocrisy is shocking but there's no doubt in my mind that the aim
is to rid us of the monarchy by deriding and poking fun at its next
incumbent and the lazy and easily-led fall for it.

I am not lazy, hypocritical, or easily-led. I do object to Chas'
outspoken political (and, yes, often loony) agendas, I object to him
being himself hypocritical and being an "incumbent" and would be happy
to see the Monarchy end with the demise of our current Queen,
hopefully in the far-distant future..

I am not alone.


--
(¯`·. ®óñ© © ²°¹° .·´¯)

I am sorry that my light hearted comment re. Prince Charles and my attempt
at dry stone walling was not taken as such, a light hearted comment.


No problem, Kate, no problem at all. I followed up with my comments
about the bonny prince with an equally light-hearted arboricultural
remark (ie on- topic)
It is not totally unsurprising that a further (off-topic)
pro-monarchist polemic ensued which will not be dignified by a further
response from this Pc


--
(¯`·. ®óñ© © ²°¹° .·´¯)