Quote:
Originally Posted by Billy[_10_]
In article ,
phorbin wrote:
In article , ask@itshall
says...
It probably depends on the importance you put on the survival of a huge
slab
of the human race. Personally, I think humanity needs a good scourge, but
most people don't see it the same way as I do. I reckon that at least half
of the human race could disappear and that that would be a good thing.
I used to feel this way until I realized that a disease that can take
out 50% can take out 100% by itself without considering waves of
disease, vermin, etc. that would follow.
Great book, "The World Without Us", by Alan Weisman
Amazon.com: The World Without Us: Alan Weisman: Books
_1_1?s=books&ie=UTF8&qid=1282344894&sr=1-1
If you liked Jerod Diamond's books, you'll like this one.
In a hundred thousand years (the blink of an eye in geologic time),
things could get back to normal(?) on Earth.
--
- Billy
"Fascism should more properly be called corporatism because it is the
merger of state and corporate power." - Benito Mussolini.
Maude Barlow: "The World Has Divided into Rich and Poor as at No Time in History"
Israel cracks down on dissent - middleeast - Al Jazeera English |
Default I've got honey bees
phorbin wrote:
In article 840119220303917960.801087dan-
,
dude says...
What makes you the law giver that determine "what is right"?
Are you going to remove what is not native?
Or is it natural selection?
Balvenie - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
I imagine a good scotch whiskey is a good answer as any
--
Enjoy Life... Dan Using an iPad
Report this post as spam, offensive or inappropriate Reply With Quote Multi-Quote This Message