In article , Stewart Robert Hinsley
writes
The label looks fairly unambiguous - so any mangling of the name
occurred before the label was interred, rather than after it was
disinterred. I've looked in IPNI, and there's no published name close
in spelling to ancluvita, so unfortunately it doesn't help.

It might be worth checking the print version of PlantFinder (59 pages
of results on the web version is a bit cumbersome), but if that's a
collector's number one presumes it's a species and not a cultivar.

The presumed collector's number could be JH1945 rather than JH1745. The
former might just indicate the source (e.g. nursery) and date.


Thanks Stewart
--
Janet Tweedy
Dalmatian Telegraph
http://www.lancedal.demon.co.uk