View Single Post
  #29   Report Post  
Old 27-11-2010, 12:45 AM posted to alt.usenet.kooks,comp.os.linux.advocacy,comp.sys.mac.advocacy,rec.gardens
Snit Snit is offline
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by GardenBanter: Oct 2010
Posts: 75
Default An Apple apologist... or something else?

Big Crotch on a Small Fish stated in post on
11/26/10 5:33 PM:

Steve Carroll wrote:
On Nov 26, 4:17 pm, Snit wrote:
Tim Adams stated in post

on 11/26/10 4:01 PM:

...





You 'showed him' AFTER he pointed out to you how it was done. Why
don't you at
least try and get your facts right once?

And you made that up, too.

Sorry to say, your 'facts' don't agree with google. IOW you're the
one making it
up.

More babbling by the trolling idiot michael glasser snipped

--
regarding Snit "You are not flamed because you speak the truth,
you are flamed because you are a hideous troll and keep disrupting
the newsgroup." Andrew J. Brehm

And more detail for you, from a past post (not worth re-wording for
you... given how it is 100% predictable you will snip, run and lie
in response to the following):

Yes, he found a quirk (a bug, an inconsistency...


... "user error"?

Oh did you forget that you also labeled it that way, Snit? You never
did explain how a "bug" is "user error".


I have explained both the bug and your error many times, Steve.

wow, I have used multiple
terms, Steve's head will spin!).


No, I'm well used to your tautologies and the confusion only you have
over them.


The fact I used different (though accurate) terms is confusing you. Oh
well.

There is *a* way that you can copy
multiple aliases in icon view that does not work in the other views,
but there is also *a* way (or maybe more) that works in all of the
views.



So you finally wrapped your head around this concept... good for you.


You are very proud you found an inconsistency in how the views work.
Lovely. You earn a gold star.

Steve, initially, was wrong about there not being a way


But I didn't say there wasn't "a way", I specifically said that he
couldn't do it "this way" (the "way" I was doing it at the time).

Just when you appeared to be making your "way" forward too... such a
shame. LOL!


Your "defense" is you were not denying it could be done. Which is clearly a
lie. You are lying, Steve.

.. and then after he
changed his mind about that and learned there was a way in icon
view, he was wrong about there not being a way in the other views.

As you have seen... and as Steve was shown and thus, if he was not
an idiot, learned:

http://goo.gl/cd8X Thu, 14 Oct 2010 15:17:27 GMT
http://goo.gl/CVc4C Thu, 14 Oct 2010 16:25:30 GMT
http://goo.gl/beyx Fri, 15 Oct 2010 02:39:06 GMT

The three videos that I made, each done before Steve *claimed* to
finally figure it out based on an anonymous email he got.


I *claimed* to have figured out 'a way' right away and I posted about
it, as google proves.


And you did this several hours after I showed you. Yippee... several
*hours* after being shown the above videos you figured out how to do what
you were shown.

And you are proud. Good. You get a second gold star.

Notably, not a single one of your videos
showed you trying to do it the "way" I said it couldn't be done.


The videos show the correct way. The last one, in particular, shows your
comments and then shows why they are wrong.

Poor Steve: cannot deal with the fact he was wrong.

In
fact, when you tried it 'that way' you even agreed that it was
inconsistent as you labeled it a "bug", an "inconsistency" and
finally "user error"... as if a "bug" or "inconsistency" could
possibly be categorized as "user error" by any sane, honest and
honorable person.


You already got your gold star for finding the inconsistency. Stop
bragging.


Oh, an anonymous email that must remain private. Tee hee. But let us say he
actually got one... which is unlikely given his history of lying, but
whatever... say he got one. So? So someone finally explained to him what he
could not figure out on his own *or* with the videos I provided him. That is
right: Steve claims he was too stupid to figure it out from the video and
needed an anonymous email.

LOL!

Even when Steve tries to look clever he just ends up claiming he is an idiot.


Gee, Steve... are your crickets going to chirp now? LOL! You just run away
scared.

Oh, and even more fun. The first post where Steve claimed to have gotten
this email was http://goo.gl/roRor. Oct. 14 at 6:58 PM (over 16 hours
*after* the posting of the video which he and Tim Adams claim came after
Steve's email):

-----
This person emailed me with the following text:
"Steve, When selecting the files, when you select the very last
one you want to make an alias of, select and drag it. That way you
are not de-selecting anything in the list. Works for me on an iMac
and a MBP, in icon, list and column view."
-----

But my videos, which anyone can verify, were posted *before* that. Yes.
Easy to verify... javascript:alert(document.lastModified) on the videos will
work just fine to prove it for example... and is how I got the info for
above.

But, even more funny:

Steve Carroll, 5 Nov 2010
-----
BTW... there is an email but I can't divulge it unless the person
who wrote it gives me permission. See, unlike you, I don't divulge
private emails while I make a claim about being "honest and
honorable".
-----

LOL! Steve had already "divulged" the email in his past lies... he then
turns around and denies that he would ever sink to such a level.


Gee, Steve... no wonder you hear crickets chirping so often... you have
*nothing* to say to fill the silence. Not when you are faced with your own
lies. LOL!

Too damned funny! Once again, Steve piles his lies higher and higher and
they just come toppling down on him!



LOL!



--
[INSERT .SIG HERE]