27-11-2010, 02:28 AM
posted to alt.usenet.kooks,comp.os.linux.advocacy,comp.sys.mac.advocacy,rec.gardens
|
|
external usenet poster
|
|
First recorded activity by GardenBanter: Oct 2010
Posts: 137
|
|
An Apple apologist... or something else?
Steve Carroll wrote:
On Nov 26, 5:45 pm, Snit wrote:
(snip)
I have explained both the bug and your error many times, Steve.
Said Snit as he used yet another sock puppet, this time for the
purpose of pretending it's mine so he doesn't have to break his vow to
not talk to me directly (yes Snit, your games are *that* obvious).
Maybe you'll grow up next year.
wow, I have used multiple
terms, Steve's head will spin!).
No, I'm well used to your tautologies and the confusion only you
have over them.
The fact
... that you called the same thing different names, one of them being
"user error" is documented in the google archive, as I have repeatedly
shown.
There is *a* way that you can copy
multiple aliases in icon view that does not work in the other
views, but there is also *a* way (or maybe more) that works in
all of the views.
So you finally wrapped your head around this concept... good for
you.
You are very proud you found an inconsistency in how the views work.
I am honest that I found an inconsistency using the "way" that I
mentioned, you know, the same "way" that you initially agreed was
inconsistent (and are still agreeing), despite also labeling it as
"user error".
Steve, initially, was wrong about there not being a way
But I didn't say there wasn't "a way", I specifically said that he
couldn't do it "this way" (the "way" I was doing it at the time).
Just when you appeared to be making your "way" forward too... such
a shame. LOL!
Your "defense
I don't need a "defense" from your delusions, Snit... no one ever did.
Reality check from google... (again): "...but you can only do one app
at a time this way. Even so, thirty apps shouldn't take too long to
do, even this way." - Steve Carroll
"this way" - Steve Carroll
"even this way" - Steve Carroll
Notably, not a single one of your videos
showed you trying to do it the "way" I said it couldn't be done.
The videos show the correct way.
LOL! Now we have yet another "way" thrown into the mix by you.
You seem to forget that the google archive shows me talking about me
accomplishing this another "way" and it worked just fine. How do you
know the "way" you are referencing here is the "correct way"?
Poor Steve: cannot deal with the fact he was wrong.
Your claims that I was "wrong" and that a "bug" or an "inconsistency"
are the same thing as "user error" have no support. Restating the
claims ad infinitum don't make them real... no matter how much glue
you've sniffed
LOL!
--
You Ain't the Biggest Fish in the Crotch
|