View Single Post
  #37   Report Post  
Old 27-11-2010, 04:18 AM posted to alt.usenet.kooks,comp.os.linux.advocacy,comp.sys.mac.advocacy,rec.gardens
Snit Snit is offline
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by GardenBanter: Oct 2010
Posts: 75
Default An Apple apologist... or something else?

Big Crotch on a Small Fish stated in post on
11/26/10 8:32 PM:

Steve Carroll wrote:
On Nov 26, 7:48 pm, Snit wrote:

One: that has nothing to do with the topic


Your sock puppets never did have anything to do with the topic. So why
do you keep using them?

"this way" - Steve Carroll
"even this way" - Steve Carroll

See:


I "see" that I used the google archive to prove I used the term "this
way"... despite you trying to pretend I didn't or that it didn't
specifically reference a certain "way".


LOL! Now we have yet another "way" thrown into the mix by you.

Nope. I showed one way... the way that works.


So, if a "way" happens to be one that "works" it's the "correct" way.
That is what you just argued. Fine... then I pointed to a "correct"
way, too.

You claimed the way you were talking about did not work.


Incorrect: I didn't just *claim* it, I got you to agree with it as you
labeled it 3 different things.

There is no reason this needs to be a debate.


I agree, especially being that you admitted I found an
"inconsistency". But that's you...generally found arguing 'stupid
debates' based on personalities.


LOL!


If I keep giving you attention, Steve, how long will you continue to make an
ass out of yourself again? Remember: this is not hard - you did not know
how something was done... I showed you... you were still confused and said
it could only be done in one view... I showed you that you were wrong.
Along the way you noted an inconsistency in how something works.

And that should be that. But it is not: you insist on trolling and lying
and spewing accusations - proving your deep hatred and jealousy. It really
is that simple.


--
[INSERT .SIG HERE]