An Apple apologist... or something else?
Big Crotch on a Small Fish stated in post on
11/26/10 8:32 PM:
Steve Carroll wrote:
On Nov 26, 7:48 pm, Snit wrote:
One: that has nothing to do with the topic
Your sock puppets never did have anything to do with the topic. So why
do you keep using them?
"this way" - Steve Carroll
"even this way" - Steve Carroll
See:
I "see" that I used the google archive to prove I used the term "this
way"... despite you trying to pretend I didn't or that it didn't
specifically reference a certain "way".
LOL! Now we have yet another "way" thrown into the mix by you.
Nope. I showed one way... the way that works.
So, if a "way" happens to be one that "works" it's the "correct" way.
That is what you just argued. Fine... then I pointed to a "correct"
way, too.
You claimed the way you were talking about did not work.
Incorrect: I didn't just *claim* it, I got you to agree with it as you
labeled it 3 different things.
There is no reason this needs to be a debate.
I agree, especially being that you admitted I found an
"inconsistency". But that's you...generally found arguing 'stupid
debates' based on personalities.
LOL!
If I keep giving you attention, Steve, how long will you continue to make an
ass out of yourself again? Remember: this is not hard - you did not know
how something was done... I showed you... you were still confused and said
it could only be done in one view... I showed you that you were wrong.
Along the way you noted an inconsistency in how something works.
And that should be that. But it is not: you insist on trolling and lying
and spewing accusations - proving your deep hatred and jealousy. It really
is that simple.
--
[INSERT .SIG HERE]
|