An Apple apologist... or something else?
In article ,
Snit wrote:
Big Crotch on a Small Fish stated in post on
11/26/10 8:32 PM:
Steve Carroll wrote:
On Nov 26, 7:48 pm, Snit wrote:
One: that has nothing to do with the topic
Your sock puppets never did have anything to do with the topic. So why
do you keep using them?
"this way" - Steve Carroll
"even this way" - Steve Carroll
See:
I "see" that I used the google archive to prove I used the term "this
way"... despite you trying to pretend I didn't or that it didn't
specifically reference a certain "way".
LOL! Now we have yet another "way" thrown into the mix by you.
Nope. I showed one way... the way that works.
So, if a "way" happens to be one that "works" it's the "correct" way.
That is what you just argued. Fine... then I pointed to a "correct"
way, too.
You claimed the way you were talking about did not work.
Incorrect: I didn't just *claim* it, I got you to agree with it as you
labeled it 3 different things.
There is no reason this needs to be a debate.
I agree, especially being that you admitted I found an
"inconsistency". But that's you...generally found arguing 'stupid
debates' based on personalities.
LOL!
If I keep giving you attention, Steve, how long will you continue to make an
ass out of yourself again?
The problem with that is - Steve is proving michael glasser to be the ass! Of
course, with michael's (documented) poor reading comprehension skills, michael
still doesn't understand that simple FACT!
--
regarding Snit "You are not flamed because you speak the truth,
you are flamed because you are a hideous troll and keep disrupting
the newsgroup." Andrew J. Brehm
|