On Nov 29, 12:16*pm, Snit wrote:
Big Crotch on a Small Fish stated in post on
11/29/10 12:13 PM:

...

* actual guilt
* adjudication

What happened to actual guilt vs. legal guilt? *Changing your goal posts
again.

Nice dodge.

He missed the larger point anyway... gee, the same one you always miss
it, funny that. Point to "guilt" of another person as seen by a third
party where the guilt hasn't been established via a finding. That
finding requires looking... at "evidence". The job of evidence is to
make something evident to those doing the looking. You looked at what
you labeled as your evidence (it was really just stuff you parroted
from around the net) and said it didn't contain a single true thing
from which something else could necessarily follow. It doesn't matter
what word you use to describe an absence of truth, all your word games
aside... if truth isn't there.... it isn't there. Are you ready to
sing a different tune on this YET?