Thread
:
Are all trolls bad at math?
View Single Post
#
41
29-11-2010, 07:58 PM posted to alt.motorcycles,alt.usenet.kooks,comp.sys.mac.advocacy,rec.gardens
Snit
external usenet poster
First recorded activity by GardenBanter: Oct 2010
Posts: 75
Are all trolls bad at math?
Big Crotch on a Small Fish stated in post
on
11/29/10 12:54 PM:
Steve Carroll wrote:
On Nov 29, 12:16 pm, Snit wrote:
Big Crotch on a Small Fish stated in post
on 11/29/10 12:13 PM:
...
* actual guilt
* adjudication
What happened to actual guilt vs. legal guilt? Changing your goal
posts again.
Nice dodge.
He missed the larger point anyway... gee, the same one you always miss
it, funny that. Point to "guilt" of another person as seen by a third
party where the guilt hasn't been established via a finding. That
finding requires looking... at "evidence". The job of evidence is to
make something evident to those doing the looking. You looked at what
you labeled as your evidence (it was really just stuff you parroted
from around the net) and said it didn't contain a single true thing
from which something else could necessarily follow. It doesn't matter
what word you use to describe an absence of truth, all your word games
aside... if truth isn't there.... it isn't there. Are you ready to
sing a different tune on this YET?
LOL!
* Proof: as in that found in a mathematical proof, an absolute concept
* Proof: as in adjudication, "proof beyond a reasonable doubt"
Based on your ignorance, since 2003 you have wanted me to "sing a different
tune" when you *should* have been working to understand those concepts. The
concepts are not hard - yet it is nearing a *decade* of you obsessing over
this!
--
[INSERT .SIG HERE]
Reply With Quote
Snit
View Public Profile
Find all posts by Snit